Waves striking a breakwater in a repeating pattern

First intelligence module

The same wave, ten million times.One of them is not a wave.

Telecommunications combines extreme transaction volume, layered intermediaries and contractual compensation. Under those conditions a small structural defect does not stay small. It repeats, silently, for years.

Footage: Chang Trai Nong Thon / Pexels

Why telecom first

It is the hardest ordinary case.

If an examination method holds against tens of millions of subscriber events, dealer hierarchies and clawback terms, it holds elsewhere. Telecom is our first intelligence pack, not the extent of the practice.

01

Volume hides repetition

At this scale, a defect that touches a fraction of a percent of records is still a multi million dollar position.

02

Intermediaries break the chain

Dealers, agents and vendors introduce boundaries where operational events stop travelling.

03

Compensation is contractual

Which means most recovery is pursued under rights the operator already holds.

04

Lifecycles, not snapshots

A subscriber relationship is a sequence of events. Every system stores a state instead.

Coverage

What the telecommunications pack examines.

Acquisition

Where a relationship began, who was credited for it, and whether the record supports either.

Eligibility

Whether the basis for a subsidised or qualified relationship existed for the period claimed.

Activations

Activation events reconciled against provisioning, billing and compensation over the same window.

Network usage

Usage that supports, or fails to support, the state the commercial systems assert.

Billing

Charges, credits and adjustments traced back to the entitlement that authorised them.

Commissions

Compensation tested against the lifecycle it was earned on, not the volume it was booked on.

Inventory

Device and SIM movement examined against sale, activation and return records.

Dealers

Concentration and persistence across the channel, sustained rather than episodic.

Chargebacks

Clawback rights that were enforceable and the events that should have triggered them.

Vendors

Invoiced amounts against the rate in force at the date of service.

Reimbursements

Claims examined against the program terms and the delivery record behind them.

Customer complaints

Complaint narratives read as evidence, because they often describe the defect first.

Telecom intelligence services

Six intelligence services built for telecom records.

Each service examines a portion of the telecom lifecycle that most systems only own one slice of. Together they cover the space between acquisition and disconnect where contradictions hide.

01

Subscriber Lifecycle Integrity

Examines the complete subscriber record across application, eligibility, enrollment, activation, usage, billing, reimbursement, recertification, and deactivation.

  • Active in one system and disconnected in another
  • Reimbursement after eligibility ended
  • Activation without meaningful usage
  • Usage without corresponding billing
  • Deactivation events that never reached downstream systems
  • Duplicate subscriber, address, device, or benefit relationships
  • Recertification failures not reflected in status
  • Subscribers moved between providers without complete treatment

USAC itself identifies non-usage and duplicate-subscriber conditions as recurring Lifeline program-integrity issues.

02

Device, SIM and eSIM Lifecycle Intelligence

Tracks purchase, receipt, assignment, activation, usage, reassignment, return, deactivation, credit, and disposal.

  • IMEI, ICCID, EID, or SIM records in multiple locations
  • Devices assigned without activation
  • Activations without inventory removal
  • Returns without corresponding credits
  • Reissued devices still attached to prior accounts
  • eSIM profiles issued but never activated
  • Repeated profile issuance
  • Devices receiving subsidy or reimbursement without supported delivery
  • Physical and digital inventory telling different stories

Especially powerful because most telecom systems only own one portion of the lifecycle.

03

Network Usage and Service Delivery Integrity

Compares what the carrier, MVNO, billing platform, customer system, and reimbursement system each say occurred.

  • Active accounts without service usage
  • Usage on accounts shown as disconnected
  • Usage routed to the wrong subscriber or plan
  • Wholesale usage charges without matching customer activity
  • Missing or duplicated usage records
  • Service delivered outside paid or authorized periods
  • Unusual consumption patterns
  • Network events that never reached billing or compliance systems
04

Subsidy and Reimbursement Integrity

Examines whether every claimed reimbursement was supported by eligibility, enrollment, service delivery, usage, and program rules.

  • Payments after eligibility ended
  • Unsupported subscriber months
  • Duplicate benefit relationships
  • Non-usage not properly reflected
  • Reimbursements inconsistent with activation status
  • Claims that cannot be reconstructed at subscriber level
  • Corrections made in one system but not another
  • Amounts excluded or underpaid despite supported eligibility

Improper-payment prevention is a permanent need across government programs. GAO reported approximately $186 billion in estimated improper payments for fiscal year 2025, with about 82% attributed to overpayments.

05

Carrier Settlement and Wholesale Billing Integrity

Examines wholesale usage, rate plans, minimum commitments, platform charges, activation fees, roaming, network access, adjustments, credits, termination fees, and settlement statements.

  • Wholesale usage that cannot be reconstructed from subscriber records
  • Rate plans applied inconsistently with the agreement
  • Minimum-commitment shortfalls and overcharges
  • Platform and activation fees without supporting activity
  • Roaming and network-access charges untested against usage
  • Adjustments and credits outside documented basis
  • Termination fees applied outside contract terms
  • Settlement statements that do not trace to underlying records
06

Porting, Churn and Disconnect Integrity

Examines whether subscriber departures, transfers, porting events, churn classifications, final billing, device obligations, commissions, and reimbursements were treated consistently.

  • Ported subscribers still billed
  • Disconnected accounts still generating compensation
  • Churn attributed to the wrong channel
  • Transfer events appearing as new acquisition
  • Final credits or balances never processed
  • Reconnected customers counted multiple times
  • Commission or reimbursement continuing after departure

Frequently asked

How the telecom services run, what evidence is preserved, and how findings arrive.

These are the questions operators ask before an examination begins. The answers describe the discipline, not the marketing.

A tugboat guiding a container ship many times its size

Representative engagement

Compensation continued after the relationship ended, in every system that was individually correct.

$4.29m

Confirmed exposure, deterministic and reproducible

$3.61m

Recoverable under contract terms already in force

9

Substantiated findings from 142 detected anomalies

96.8%

Custody completeness across the evidence set

Footage: willy one / Pexels

Industry neutral core

Telecom changes the labels. It does not change the discipline.

  • Matters, evidence, custody events, data sources, entities and transactions are universal.
  • Anomalies, findings, calculations, controls and exposure are universal.
  • Reviews, reports, exhibits, certifications and exports are universal.
  • Industry packs change source types, labels, validation rules and analytical methods.
  • Government programs, healthcare, insurance, banking and payments follow the same core.
  • Logistics, energy, aviation, construction, retail and manufacturing follow the same core.

Coverage areas describe what is examined. Detection logic, thresholds, weighting and rules are proprietary and are never published.

If the numbers have stopped agreeing with each other, that disagreement is evidence.

Request an examination