
Inside the investigation
An examination is not a report writing exercise with data attached. It is a sequence of six stages, each of which can end the work if the evidence does not hold.
Method
We take custody of the records that matter and preserve every original exactly as received, with an integrity value recorded on intake.
We reconcile systems against one another over the same period to surface combinations that cannot all be true.
Analysts examine every candidate, test alternative explanations, and discard what the evidence does not support.
A finding exists only when a named analyst can trace it to source records and an independent reviewer agrees.
Exposure is computed deterministically, with stated inputs, calculation versions and a duplicate exposure check.
We map the control failures that permitted it and set out what recovery and remediation require.

Most of what matters
is below the last place anyone looked.
Difference
| Conventional review | PERISCOPE examination |
|---|---|
| Samples a population to estimate a rate | Examines the full population to name specific records |
| Tests whether systems reconcile | Tests whether the combined account could have happened |
| Reports issues and observations | Substantiates findings a named analyst traced to source |
| Estimates impact | Computes exposure deterministically, reproducible to the cent |
| Numbers cited without lineage | Every material statement traceable to preserved evidence |
| Findings assessed by the reviewer alone | Independent review, classification and certification before release |
Discipline